HackerPapers

arXiv:1311.6806astro-ph.EP

Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars

Erik A. Petigura, Andrew W. Howard, Geoffrey W. Marcy

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Determining whether Earth-like planets are common or rare looms as a touchstone in the question of life in the universe. We searched for Earth-size planets that cross in front of their host stars by examining the brightness measurements of 42,000 stars from National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Kepler mission. We found 603 planets, including 10 that are Earth size (1-2 Earth-radii) and receive comparable levels of stellar energy to that of Earth (within a factor of four). We account for Kepler's imperfect detectability of such planets by injecting synthetic planet-caused dimmings into the Kepler brightness measurements and recording the fraction detected. We find that $11\pm4%$ of Sun-like stars harbor an Earth-size planet receiving between one and four times the stellar intensity as Earth. We also find that the occurrence of Earth-size planets is constant with increasing orbital period (P), within equal intervals of logP up to $\sim200$ d. Extrapolating, one finds $5.7^{+1.7}_{-2.2}%$ of Sun-like stars harbor an Earth-size planet with orbital periods of 200-400 d.

arXiv comments
Main text: 6 pages, 5 figures, 1 table. Supporting information: 54 pages, 17 pages, 3 tables. Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences available at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319909110
Journal reference
PNAS 2013 110 (48) 19175-19176
DOI
doi:10.1073/pnas.1319909110
Subjects
astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2022 to Oct 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Star Trek (1964) [pdf] 1 comment
    • Well given how much we have learned about exoplanets, I'd say that at least one number of the assumptions are rather moot. The "how many stars even have planets" can be assumed to be basically "all of them" statistically speaking. ( https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10684 )…

      techdragonView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.