An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics · HackerPapers discussions

An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by cosmophany

Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:45:44 GMT

(pro QBist physicist here). Just some clarifications on the interesting points you raise. 1. In practice, experimental physicists can and do disagree all the time about what their apparatuses are doing, what the results mean, and so on -- at least, they do at the beginning of the experiment. By the end, they have gone through a process that results in agreement, which allows them to write a paper together declaring things in an objective manner. So it is important to distinguish between the "inputs" to scientific practice (our individual, subjective initial guesses about what is going on)…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by phayes

Wed, 06 Mar 2019 05:11:55 GMT

> If foundations of QM are non-local They're not. Non-locality is an artifact of certain interpretations / modifications of QM (where it isn't simply a misconception). See e.g. https://sci-hub.tw/10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424011 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2120 or the QBism intro https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.5253 or Ray Streater's old EPR webpage https://web.archive.org/web/20151117174141/http://www.mth.kc... or Gell-Mann's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNAw-xXCcM8 or...

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics — HN submission

Mon, 30 May 2016 09:02:59 GMT

An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of QM (2013)

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.