HackerPapers

arXiv:1311.4555stat.ML

Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknife

Stefan Wager, Trevor Hastie, Bradley Efron

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We study the variability of predictions made by bagged learners and random forests, and show how to estimate standard errors for these methods. Our work builds on variance estimates for bagging proposed by Efron (1992, 2012) that are based on the jackknife and the infinitesimal jackknife (IJ). In practice, bagged predictors are computed using a finite number B of bootstrap replicates, and working with a large B can be computationally expensive. Direct applications of jackknife and IJ estimators to bagging require B on the order of n^{1.5} bootstrap replicates to converge, where n is the size of the training set. We propose improved versions that only require B on the order of n replicates. Moreover, we show that the IJ estimator requires 1.7 times less bootstrap replicates than the jackknife to achieve a given accuracy. Finally, we study the sampling distributions of the jackknife and IJ variance estimates themselves. We illustrate our findings with multiple experiments and simulation studies.

arXiv comments
To appear in Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics) stat.COComputation (Statistics) stat.MEMethodology (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2015 to May 2015.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Yes, you should be able to estimate a confidence interval by looking at the distribution of votes from each tree. [1] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.4555.pdf

      pigscantflyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.