<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantropy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1311.0813/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1311.0813/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantropy — mentioned by mikhailfranco</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23696743</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1311.0813:23696743</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 01:24:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Baez always makes interesting reading. At the end of the abstract there is the arxiv-bait &amp;quot;inverse temperature is imaginary time&amp;quot;, which relates to Wick Rotation and his work on quantropy a few years ago: http://jakobschwichtenberg.com/wick-rotation-action-formalis... https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/quantropy/ https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0813 TL;DR if Boltzmann says thermodynamic states occur in proportion to exp(-E/kT), Feynman says paths in the quantum state space occur with weight exp(-S/i hbar), and action S ~ Et, then there is some analogy, ignoring constants (k,hbar,c)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1311.0813/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
