<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu — mentioned by anthk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46530405</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.8343:46530405</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:28:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You could be surprised when Science, IT and metaphysics meet: https://github.com/kl4yfd/timewave_z3r0 https://github.com/jasondrawdy/Omniwave Now point that to 12th August, 2026 to see it&amp;#x27;s there&amp;#x27;s some relation. The lower the Y point = the more the &amp;#x27;novelty&amp;#x27;. It&amp;#x27;s a bit of crackpot science but that would just mean most of the humanity behaviour from genomics it&amp;#x27;s highly predictable except for some cosmetics and newer knowledge. You can see these patterns in big human gatherings. And under bird flocks. The more people you connect, the less individuality you&amp;#x27;ll get, as some unique behaviour…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu — mentioned by goldenkey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27100864</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.8343:27100864</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 23:27:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I have huge problems believing The universe is indifferent to your persuasions. The double slit experiment has been successfully performed on large molecules of 810 atoms. Quantum mechanics is fundamentally about knowledge and information after interactions. You seem to be a physics guy but something tells me you aren&amp;#x27;t aware that every single interaction causes entanglement. Entanglement is simply a constraint on interaction products, given the input particles. It is just easier to see its effects on small objects since they are less likely to be perturbed. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8343&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu — mentioned by somethingroma</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17978273</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.8343:17978273</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:06:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They&amp;#x27;ve gotten it a little bit bigger than a buckyball https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8343 Also what&amp;#x27;s cool is that these things are visible under an electron microscope (so are buckyballs iirc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13773354</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.8343:13773354</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:36:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I’m not sure I believe that a mathematical formalism that is unable to make useful real world predictions deserves the “theory” moniker. Hence your list of quantum theories of gravity aren’t. On the contrary, the ones I listed are all completely in accord with General Relativity up to strong gravity and absent superposed sources, which is found from studying the renormalization group flow of perturbative quantum gravity and is four loops of gravitons in a 3+1 dimensional spacetime. Strong gravity can only be found very close to the singularity of black holes (and well inside event horizons…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.8343/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
