<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1484/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1484/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by Orlanthai</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24421090</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.1484:24421090</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:05:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The state&amp;#x27;s evolution will be completely equivalent to (a linear superposition of) the evolution of |x&amp;gt;|x&amp;gt; and |y&amp;gt;|y&amp;gt;. That&amp;#x27;s a physically observable fact that&amp;#x27;s independent of your choice of basis (it&amp;#x27;s less obvious in the |z&amp;gt;/|w&amp;gt; basis, but it&amp;#x27;s still true). Of course the state can be written in the form |xx&amp;gt; + |yy&amp;gt;. I never denied that. The point is that it can be written in other forms. So it&amp;#x27;s equally correct to say we&amp;#x27;d &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; |zz&amp;gt; + |ww&amp;gt; + |zw&amp;gt; + |wz&amp;gt; as to say we&amp;#x27;d experience |xx&amp;gt; + |yy&amp;gt; so there&amp;#x27;s no reason to say we&amp;#x27;d &amp;quot;obviously&amp;quot; experience only the latter. Your argument is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1484/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
