<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GOTCHA Password Hackers! · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1137/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1137/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>GOTCHA Password Hackers! — mentioned by idupree</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6551740</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1310.1137:6551740</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:07:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.1137v1.pdf Its thesis: &amp;quot;We introduce GOTCHAs (Generating panOptic Turing Tests to Tell Computers and Humans Apart) as a way of preventing automated offline dictionary attacks against user selected passwords.&amp;quot; It cites http://eprint.iacr.org/2006/276.pdf which it is an improvement upon. As far as I can tell from reading the papers, though it does not state this, the purpose is to make offline dictionary attacks harder by helping the users create/remember a higher amount of entropy than they do with a password.[1] Given ten images to be matched up with…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1310.1137/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
