https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.5673/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44447368urn:hackerpapers:mention:1309.5673:44447368Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:44:37 GMT<p>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5673 &gt; Decision making – When people are given a chance to play a particular gamble twice, if they think they won the first play, or alternatively if they think they lost the first play, then the majority chooses to play again on the second round. Given these preferences, they should also play the second round even if they don’t think about the outcome of the first round. Yet people do just the opposite in the latter case (Tversky &amp; Shafir, 1992). This finding violates the law of total probability, yet it can be explained as a quantum interference effect I wouldn&#x27;t…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.5673/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>q-bio.NC