<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A reference-beam autocollimator with nanoradian sensitivity from mHz to kHz and dynamic range of 10^7 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.4828/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.4828/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A reference-beam autocollimator with nanoradian sensitivity from mHz to kHz and dynamic range of 10^7 — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18168414</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1309.4828:18168414</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:39:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One need not have something as expensive as Hubble to have such angle sensitivity. This instrument can resolve an angle change of &amp;lt; 0.3 millionths of a degree in one second. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4828 Disclaimer -- am an author. Edit: and this instrument, using the autocollimator above, can do the same thing for inertial sensing. Same disclaimer applies. https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4862816&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.4828/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ins-det</category></item><item><title>A reference-beam autocollimator with nanoradian sensitivity from mHz to kHz and dynamic range of 10^7 — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7650606</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1309.4828:7650606</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 06:18:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Corning&amp;#x27;s specs state &amp;quot;Compatible with USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 devices&amp;quot;, so I&amp;#x27;m still an optimist. We tried to get one early from them, and nearly did, but ultimately couldn&amp;#x27;t. At $100, I&amp;#x27;m sure we&amp;#x27;ll be trying it out when they&amp;#x27;re available. Our applications already function well without isolation [1,2], but I&amp;#x27;d love to know for certain that the last little bit of ADC noise we see is intrinsic to our readout system and not a little bit of hash on ground. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4828 [2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4412&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.4828/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ins-det</category></item><item><title>A reference-beam autocollimator with nanoradian sensitivity from mHz to kHz and dynamic range of 10^7 — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6867763</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1309.4828:6867763</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:30:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We do precision tests of gravity and searches for forces weaker than gravity. (Front page is dated, see publications tab for more recent work) http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/ The most-important experiment we do is to test the Equivalence Principle [1], the idea that if you drop two things in vacuum, they&amp;#x27;ll fall at the same rate regardless of what they&amp;#x27;re made from. Results from our lab have shown that, at 1 part in 10,000,000,000,000 (10^-13), that&amp;#x27;s apparently true. General Relativity takes the Equivalence Principle as a postulate, and works from there. Many theories of new physics…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1309.4828/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ins-det</category></item></channel></rss>
