HackerPapers

arXiv:1309.2130q-fin.GN

The Interrupted Power Law and The Size of Shadow Banking

Davide Fiaschi, Imre Kondor, Matteo Marsili, Valerio Volpati

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Using public data (Forbes Global 2000) we show that the asset sizes for the largest global firms follow a Pareto distribution in an intermediate range, that is ``interrupted'' by a sharp cut-off in its upper tail, where it is totally dominated by financial firms. This flattening of the distribution contrasts with a large body of empirical literature which finds a Pareto distribution for firm sizes both across countries and over time. Pareto distributions are generally traced back to a mechanism of proportional random growth, based on a regime of constant returns to scale. This makes our findings of an ``interrupted'' Pareto distribution all the more puzzling, because we provide evidence that financial firms in our sample should operate in such a regime. We claim that the missing mass from the upper tail of the asset size distribution is a consequence of shadow banking activity and that it provides an (upper) estimate of the size of the shadow banking system. This estimate -- which we propose as a shadow banking index -- compares well with estimates of the Financial Stability Board until 2009, but it shows a sharper rise in shadow banking activity after 2010. Finally, we propose a proportional random growth model that reproduces the observed distribution, thereby providing a quantitative estimate of the intensity of shadow banking activity.

arXiv comments
12 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. To appear in Plos ONE 2014
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094237
Subjects
q-fin.GNGeneral Finance q-fin.STStatistical Finance

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2013 to Oct 2013. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2013 to Sep 2013. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The original paper seems to take the Global 2000 and then re-orders them by asset size, not revenue: "we find that financial firms dominate the top tail of the firm distribution by asset size" http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2130v2.pdf

      arethuzaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.