<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Terracentric Nuclear Fission Reactor: Background, Basis, Feasibility, Structure, Evidence, and Geophysical Implications · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1308.5934/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1308.5934/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Terracentric Nuclear Fission Reactor: Background, Basis, Feasibility, Structure, Evidence, and Geophysical Implications — mentioned by acidburnNSA</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40555877</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1308.5934:40555877</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2024 17:39:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that was 2 billion years ago. Since U-235 has a shorter half-life than U-238, the natural uranium enrichment was far higher back then. And indeed that was a water-moderated reactor. [1] Some people have postulated that the moon itself was formed in a nuclear fission excursion [2], and/or that there is or was a nuclear reactor in the center of Earth [3]. These are both not commonly believed. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reacto... [2] https://phys.org/news/2010-01-moon-nuclear-explosion.html [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5934&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1308.5934/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
