<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio — mentioned by georgecmu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30251325</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1307.7006:30251325</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:18:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For those curious: The two nonsense papers are: Losada, Marcial. “The complex dynamics of high performance teams.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 30 (1999): 179-192. | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089571779... Fredrickson, B. L., &amp;amp; Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686. | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3126111/ The debunking paper is Brown, N. J. L., Sokal, A. D., &amp;amp; Friedman, H. L. (2013). The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item><item><title>The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio — mentioned by throwaway0312</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16516170</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1307.7006:16516170</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:36:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.7006.pdf Such an amusing read!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item><item><title>The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio — mentioned by Crito</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9791314</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1307.7006:9791314</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:47:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The actual paper by Nick Brown, Alan Sokal, and Harris Friedman (longer, but pretty easy reading): http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7006 See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_positivity_ratio&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item><item><title>The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6579876</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1307.7006:6579876</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:51:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.7006/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item></channel></rss>
