BGP Security in Partial Deployment: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? — HN submission

Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:43:03 GMT

BGP security in partial deployment: is the juice worth the squeeze? (2013)

5 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

BGP Security in Partial Deployment: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? — mentioned by EthanHeilman

Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:34:56 GMT

>What improvements are in the works to mitigate the effect of these sort of hijacks? I happen to have published research in this area[0]. There are two systems being developed to secure BGP. The first is the RPKI which aims to provide a Public Key Infrastructure to attest to the origination of IP addresses. To grossly oversimplify it: everyone would get a certificate that says "AS X is allowed to originate IP prefix Y". Many routers already support the RPKI[1] and the RPKI is currently undergoing deployment[2], but it should take some time before operators begin using it to make routing…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

BGP Security in Partial Deployment: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? · HackerPapers discussions

BGP Security in Partial Deployment: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? — HN submission

BGP Security in Partial Deployment: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? — mentioned by EthanHeilman