<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.2579/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.2579/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs — mentioned by jngiam1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13161222</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1307.2579:13161222</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:45:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From Coursera - we use ML in a few places: 1. Course Recommendations. We use low rank matrix factorization approaches to do recommendations, and are also looking into integrating other information sources (such as your career goals). 2. Search. Results are relevance ranked based on a variety of signals from popularity to learner preferences. 3. Learning. There&amp;#x27;s a lot of untapped potential here. We have done some research into peer grading de-biasing [1] and worked with folks at Stanford on studying how people learn to code [2]. We recently co-organized a NIPS workshop on ML for Education…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1307.2579/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
