<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chaos at Fifty · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1306.5777/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1306.5777/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Chaos at Fifty — mentioned by weerd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15462771</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1306.5777:15462771</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:55:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is an article that shares the opinion and gives an overview of key ideas. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5777 It seems like in the late 80s and early 90s this topic was very hot, then became a fad. You can find many books and papers that all have basically the same content (Lorenz/Henon attractors, logistic map, Mandelbrot set). I think it underwent a name change to &amp;quot;complexity science&amp;quot; during the 90s and 00s. I&amp;#x27;m not in academia, but I do try to follow the topic because it is truly fascinating and IMO more accessible than quantum or relativity physics because many of the systems involved…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1306.5777/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item></channel></rss>
