Cool horizons for entangled black holes · HackerPapers discussions

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — HN submission

Sun, 03 Nov 2024 18:09:13 GMT

Cool horizons for entangled black holes (2013)

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by zachf

Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:06:54 GMT

One of the most important papers in this field is [0]. (As is common in science, it built on a long history of nearby ideas, e.g. [1].) An important calculation done around this idea is presented in [2], in which remarkable progress is made on Hawking's black hole information paradox. All of these papers have some amount of mathematical backing, but you'll find plenty of formulas and calculations in [2]! [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035 [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10996

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by starbeast

Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:34:47 GMT

It did get me thinking about the 'cool horizons' paper again - https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by starbeast

Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:31:46 GMT

I been juggling the following three papers for a bit and trying to brush my maths up. I don't know why I feel a hunch between them, but I do know that the hunch is to do with this problem. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.06824.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0533.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2779.pdf I will almost certainly be wrong about whatever it is. However I may have more updates on how wrong and what it is I am wrong about, in maybe a decade or so ;)

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by elektromekatron

Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:51:30 GMT

Given your perspective, what do you make of stuff like Umbral Moonshine http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2779 and ER=EPR http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 ?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by Steuard

Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:53:11 GMT

It looks like the original research paper that this press release is talking about is here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.6850 The paper mentioned in the press release that it's directly building on (by Jensen and Karch) is: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1307.1132 And the earlier research on entangled black holes that these studies of particles are extending is here: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1306.0533 Now, none of that is likely to be readable to people who aren't string theorists: this is some pretty cutting edge pure theory, largely aimed at solving one of the major current puzzles in…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Cool horizons for entangled black holes — mentioned by ivan_ah

Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:19:13 GMT

The links to the original papers: older one: http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035v1 recent one: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 Very cool. The paper suggests a connection between the non-local properties of EPR pairs and the non-local properties of wormholes that connect distant regions of space time. EPR pair = Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair, e.g. |Phi〉 = |0〉⊗|0〉+ |1〉⊗ |1〉. (1) The vectors to the left of ⊗ represent the state of Alice, the vectors to the right of the ⊗ represent Bob's state. The + in the equation refers to the notion of quantum superposition. There is nothing mysterious about quantum…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.