<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mechanical laws of the Rindler horizon · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.4986/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.4986/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mechanical laws of the Rindler horizon — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16602976</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.4986:16602976</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:42:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;These are two excellent questions that won&amp;#x27;t find justice done to them in a comment on a discussion board like this. :-( I won&amp;#x27;t try sketch a semiclassical gravity attack on the second question, which is the harder of the two, and for the first, I&amp;#x27;ll mainly feint and point you to Greg Egan at http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Rindler/RindlerHorizon.html as a starting point. On the one hand, for a sufficiently massive black hole, the Rindler solution he explores is an excellent approximation. On the other hand, his exact solutions are (a) not fully applicable in the dynamical spacetime of a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.4986/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
