<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Studying the Internal Ballistics of a Combustion Driven Potato Cannon using High-speed Video · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0966/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0966/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Studying the Internal Ballistics of a Combustion Driven Potato Cannon using High-speed Video — mentioned by lazide</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40820778</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.0966:40820778</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:12:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No. I’m asking for citations when your assertion is that flammable hydrocarbons mixed with oxygen in an enclosed container and ignited can not exceed 30-40 psi, or the bursting force of said (often brittle) plastic enclosed container. Especially since garden variety Schedule 40 PVC in the sizes we’re talking about are rated (non-shock) for over 180 PSI and many into the 200+ PSI range but there are easy to find videos of them bursting in spud guns. [https://parts.spearsmfg.com/sourcebook/SCH40TECH_40WHTPIPE-1...] And as noted in the prior declassified paper, shock fronts from these mixtures…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0966/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
