<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The role of twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0435/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0435/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The role of twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication — mentioned by 1vuio0pswjnm7</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45398687</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.0435:45398687</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 19:30:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;A new study published in Integrative and Comparative Biology suggests that scientists are leaving X (formerly known as Twitter) in significant numbers due to its declining professional value.&amp;quot; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40637733/ See also: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02554-0 Co-author Shiffman recommended Twitter in 2012 and 2013 https://davidshiffmancv.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Shiff... https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0435 He even required his students at ASU to use Twitter as recently as 2023 https://davidshiffmancv.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Shiff...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0435/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
