<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Network-Centric Quantum Communications with Application to Critical Infrastructure Protection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0305/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0305/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Network-Centric Quantum Communications with Application to Critical Infrastructure Protection — mentioned by scythe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6164101</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.0305:6164101</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:22:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This story was posted to Hacker News in May: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5661576 http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0305?utm_source=feedly Read the arXiv paper: it&amp;#x27;s quite short and not very technical. The BB84 protocol used is described in a lower comment by &amp;#x27;harshreality. It is secure against any purely classical attacker; Preskill and Shor give a (highly involved) proof of security here: http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0003004 However, the BB84 protocol used is susceptible in its original form to quantum man-in-the-middle attacks, eg…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0305/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Network-Centric Quantum Communications with Application to Critical Infrastructure Protection — mentioned by akiselev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5842837</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.0305:5842837</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:43:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s interesting to think about where the NSA will be going with this technologically too. If they&amp;#x27;re moving towards processing of not only internet data passing through US shores but data from drones, video cameras, microphones, and other sensors world wide, they would need a hell of a lot of processing power to deal with that data. The data center in Utah would be the tip of the iceberg. As a nod to fiction like Eureka and the revelations like Los Alamos testing quantum communication for years [1], it&amp;#x27;s interesting to think what else the NSA is working on for (inter)national surveillance.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0305/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Network-Centric Quantum Communications with Application to Critical Infrastructure Protection — mentioned by jimbosis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5662905</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1305.0305:5662905</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:34:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s the link to the researchers&amp;#x27; paper on arXiv.org http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0305&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1305.0305/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
