<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How stable is the photon? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.2821/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.2821/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How stable is the photon? — mentioned by gregdunn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18437694</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1304.2821:18437694</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:39:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The 3 years/10^18 figures I used were taken from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.2821.pdf : &amp;quot;Using the largest allowed value for the photon mass from other experiments, we find a lower limit of about 3 yr on the photon rest-frame lifetime. For photons in the visible spectrum, this corresponds to a lifetime around 10^18 yrs.&amp;quot; Which does work under the assumption that photons have a non-zero rest mass, and as such, could decay. I probably should have phrased my post better - this is hardly settled science, and the majority of physicists would almost certainly say that photons, with our current…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.2821/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
