<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from "rich lists" · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.0212/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.0212/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from "rich lists" — mentioned by defertoreptar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18960802</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1304.0212:18960802</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:05:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;What I&amp;#x27;d like to see more in these articles is an acknowledgement of how power laws work (or perhaps log-normal distributions or stretched exponential distributions https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0212).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.0212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.ST</category></item><item><title>Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from "rich lists" — mentioned by nopinsight</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16594546</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1304.0212:16594546</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:00:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A key purpose of the original paper is to inform policy to improve public funding of research [1]. Thus, to a first-order approximation, it should reflect realities. However, ... The number of lucky and unlucky events in the paper (figure 5, page 8) are each around 5-7 events per agent on average, where &amp;#x27;lucky&amp;#x27; is defined as doubling the capital (or success) accumulated so far and &amp;#x27;unlucky&amp;#x27; as halving it. In the real world, how many regular people/scientists have that many career-defining events? Most are quite risk-averse, especially later in their careers. Some entrepreneurs could be…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.0212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.ST</category></item><item><title>Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from "rich lists" — mentioned by nopinsight</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16543626</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1304.0212:16543626</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:01:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Correction for above: Each factor needs not be normally distributed, just independent. Evidence that suggests Log-Normal is at least as plausible as Power Law as a model for wealth distribution: &amp;quot;Using recently developed empirical methodology for detecting power-law behaviour introduced by Clauset et al. we have found that top wealth values follow the power-law behaviour only in 35% of analysed cases. Moreover, even if the data do not rule out the power-law model usually the evidence in its favour is not conclusive – some rivals, most notably the log-normal and stretched exponential…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1304.0212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.ST</category></item></channel></rss>
