<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Universe without expansion · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.6878/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.6878/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Universe without expansion — mentioned by pdonis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25502050</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.6878:25502050</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:58:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Why is this alternative plausible theory recieving such little attention? If you&amp;#x27;re referring to the paper published by Wetterich in 2013 [1], it&amp;#x27;s because it isn&amp;#x27;t plausible at all: his theory requires that atoms are shrinking, and that is easily falsified by local experiments. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.6878/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item><item><title>A Universe without expansion — mentioned by JonnieCache</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6058525</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.6878:6058525</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:19:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Consider yourself stumbled. The paper is here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.6878/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
