<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are random trading strategies more successful than technical ones? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.4351/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.4351/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are random trading strategies more successful than technical ones? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24004071</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1303.4351:24004071</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:44:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Are random trading strategies more successful than technical ones? (2013)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22 points; 5 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.4351/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.ST</category></item><item><title>Are random trading strategies more successful than technical ones? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9563578</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1303.4351:9563578</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 10:15:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Are random trading strategies more successful than technical ones? (2013) [pdf]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17 points; 11 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.4351/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.ST</category></item></channel></rss>
