arXiv:1303.4114cs.PF
Sharp Bounds in Stochastic Network Calculus
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
The practicality of the stochastic network calculus (SNC) is often questioned on grounds of potential looseness of its performance bounds. In this paper it is uncovered that for bursty arrival processes (specifically Markov-Modulated On-Off (MMOO)), whose amenability to \textit{per-flow} analysis is typically proclaimed as a highlight of SNC, the bounds can unfortunately indeed be very loose (e.g., by several orders of magnitude off). In response to this uncovered weakness of SNC, the (Standard) per-flow bounds are herein improved by deriving a general sample-path bound, using martingale based techniques, which accommodates FIFO, SP, EDF, and GPS scheduling. The obtained (Martingale) bounds gain an exponential decay factor of ${\mathcal{O}}(e^{-αn})$ in the number of flows $n$. Moreover, numerical comparisons against simulations show that the Martingale bounds are remarkably accurate for FIFO, SP, and EDF scheduling; for GPS scheduling, although the Martingale bounds substantially improve the Standard bounds, they are numerically loose, demanding for improvements in the core SNC analysis of GPS.
> I never heard of "Network calculus and stochastic network calculus". ...and now you have :) > Certainly no such topics were in any of the applied math grad courses I took. Yeah they are a newer development. Stochastic network calculus more so. Network calculus is older, it…
sreanView on HNParent context