<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology and the Triangulation Conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.2354/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.2354/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology and the Triangulation Conjecture — mentioned by panic</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9385029</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.2354:9385029</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:50:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the actual paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.2354v4.pdf. It looks like this is their family of counter examples: A specific non-orientable five-dimensional manifold M5 with Sq1 ∆(M) ̸= 0 is constructed in [25]. Hence M5 is non-triangulable. To get non-orientable examples of non-triangulable manifolds in dimensions n &amp;gt; 5 we can take the product of M5 with the torus Tn−5. To get an orientable example in dimension 6 we can consider the non-orientable S1-bundle over M given by M ̃ ×Z/2 S1, where M ̃ → M is the oriented double cover; the total space of this bundle is orientable. To get…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.2354/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GT</category></item><item><title>Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology and the Triangulation Conjecture — mentioned by Retric</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9384984</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.2354:9384984</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:39:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems odd that they did not provide a counter example. My suspicion there is an incorrect assumption for non fractal structures. PS: This is really one of those cases where a paper does not mean much. You really need to dig through http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.2354 and find the flaw as there is no peer review. Though it supposedly is going to show up in Journal of the AMS so it&amp;#x27;s not junk and probably worth diging into.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.2354/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GT</category></item><item><title>Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology and the Triangulation Conjecture — mentioned by pdpi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8881424</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.2354:8881424</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:56:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems that, though the posted article is new, the research in question is actually a couple of years old -- http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.2354&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.2354/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GT</category></item></channel></rss>
