<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Automated Identification and Classification of Stereochemistry: Chirality and Double Bond Stereoisomerism · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.1724/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.1724/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Automated Identification and Classification of Stereochemistry: Chirality and Double Bond Stereoisomerism — mentioned by dalke</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8656996</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1303.1724:8656996</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:27:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have considered it. However, I work in cheminformatics, which doesn&amp;#x27;t really fall under &amp;quot;Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and Statistics&amp;quot;. I don&amp;#x27;t see an appropriate place for my work. For example, under Quantitative Biology you&amp;#x27;ll notice a lack of pharmaceutical chemistry, toxicology, or pesticides, which are closely related areas to the types of work I do. Searching out of curiosity, I found http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1724 as an example of something in my field. It&amp;#x27;s under the catch-all &amp;quot;Computer Science &amp;gt; Computational Engineering…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1303.1724/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CE</category></item></channel></rss>
