<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wave Effect in Gravitational Lensing by the Ellis Wormhole · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.7170/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.7170/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Wave Effect in Gravitational Lensing by the Ellis Wormhole — mentioned by T-A</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24207803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1302.7170:24207803</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:39:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The original Ellis drainhole [1] has an attractive end and a repulsive end. They are both spherically symmetric and asymptotically flat, i.e. their gravitational effects fall off with distance like you&amp;#x27;d expect, and it wouldn&amp;#x27;t be immediately obvious from gravity alone that there&amp;#x27;s anything unusual about the attractive end. There is a limit case [2] of the drainhole which doesn&amp;#x27;t gravitate, in the sense that the &amp;quot;attractive&amp;quot; end has vanishing attraction and the &amp;quot;repulsive&amp;quot; end has vanishing repulsion. The wormhole in &amp;quot;Interstellar&amp;quot; was based on that solution [3]. [1]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.7170/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
