<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.6906/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.6906/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies — mentioned by grest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5432163</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1302.6906:5432163</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:40:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the risk-taking strategy of working towards a potentially high-impact publication is not worth the reward (as measured in citation rate comparing low-impact and high-impact articles )- see Foster et al Tradition and Innovation in Scientists Research Strategies http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.6906.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.6906/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
