HackerPapers

arXiv:1302.5162astro-ph.CO

On CCC-predicted concentric low-variance circles in the CMB sky

V. G. Gurzadyan, R. Penrose

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

A new analysis of the CMB, using WMAP data, supports earlier indications of non-Gaussian features of concentric circles of low temperature variance. Conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) predicts such features from supermassive black-hole encounters in an aeon preceding our Big Bang. The significance of individual low-variance circles in the true data has been disputed; yet a recent independent analysis has confirmed CCC's expectation that CMB circles have a non-Gaussian temperature distribution. Here we examine concentric sets of low-variance circular rings in the WMAP data, finding a highly non-isotropic distribution. A new "sky-twist" procedure, directly analysing WMAP data, without appeal to simulations, shows that the prevalence of these concentric sets depends on the rings being circular, rather than even slightly elliptical, numbers dropping off dramatically with increasing ellipticity. This is consistent with CCC's expectations; so also is the crucial fact that whereas some of the rings' radii are found to reach around $15^\circ$, none exceed $20^\circ$. The non-isotropic distribution of the concentric sets may be linked to previously known anomalous and non-Gaussian CMB features.

arXiv comments
17 pages, 5 figs; higher quality figs are in the journal online version
Journal reference
Eur.Phys.J. Plus 128 (2013) 22
DOI
doi:10.1140/epjp/i2013-13022-4
Subjects
astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2015 to Dec 2015.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Based on Penrose's work there may be non randomness in the CMB, with better imaging tech we may find that this is not a good source of randomness: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.5162v1.pdf

      judegomilaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.