<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.3428/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.3428/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories — mentioned by igravious</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16084793</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1302.3428:16084793</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:25:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool, that&amp;#x27;s what I was trying to find out from you. Is this [Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories](https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3428) from 2013, rev. 2015 by Barbara M. Terhal representative of the state of the art?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1302.3428/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
