<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to Scale a Code in the Human Dimension · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.7064/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.7064/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How to Scale a Code in the Human Dimension — mentioned by ngoldbaum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5611843</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1301.7064:5611843</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:23:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As discussed in the linked article, it&amp;#x27;s mostly because of code quality but with a healthy dose of percieved threat to job security. Unfortunately the academic citation economy isn&amp;#x27;t very nurturing of community codes, so a lot of work gets repeated when secretive research groups compete. That&amp;#x27;s not the whole story and the fact that this article is getting published speaks to that, however I still don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s likely that things will change in the short term. My friend Matt Turk wrote about a similar topic recently: http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.7064&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.7064/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
