<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Experimental Null test of a Mach Effect Thruster · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.6178/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.6178/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Experimental Null test of a Mach Effect Thruster — mentioned by mleonhard</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24370138</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1301.6178:24370138</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 23:43:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A 2013 paper by Fearn &amp;amp; Woodward makes no mention of the earth&amp;#x27;s magnetic field. After skimming the paper, I think their experiment is flawed. &amp;quot;Experimental Null Test of a Mach Effect Thruster.&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.6178.pdf &amp;quot;The motion of the beam is damped by a pair of aluminum plates attached to the beam that move in the magnetic field of an array of small neodymium-boron magnets. The power circuit was extensively shielded to insure that stray fields did not compromise the results.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.6178/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ins-det</category></item></channel></rss>
