<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Relational Foundations For Functorial Data Migration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1212.5303/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1212.5303/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Relational Foundations For Functorial Data Migration — mentioned by emmelaich</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7398584</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1212.5303:7398584</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:34:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here you go. It&amp;#x27;s easy with a bit of Category Theory. Just implement something along the lines of David Spivak&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;On The Relational Foundations Of Functorial Data Migration&amp;quot;. http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5303 Original motivation, from v1 of the paper: I asked whether the difficulty in changing data types to allow for longer integers was simply a storage issue or something more fundamental. They said that it was more fundamental, and in fact that my question showed how little I knew about the horrors of using databases in the real world!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1212.5303/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DB</category></item></channel></rss>
