<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bayesian Learning and Predictability in a Stochastic Nonlinear Dynamical Model · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.1717/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.1717/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bayesian Learning and Predictability in a Stochastic Nonlinear Dynamical Model — mentioned by upquark</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7271371</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1211.1717:7271371</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:50:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You are taking an extreme stance on the topic. There&amp;#x27;s room for modeling and forecasting even in highly complex dynamical systems, the models are getting better with advances in applied statistics research. They are not perfect, but they are not completely useless either. For example, here&amp;#x27;s an article I just found on modeling stochastic nonlinear dynamics in ecological/oceanographic applications: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.1717.pdf As for caterpillars predicting climate patterns, I agree with you that it&amp;#x27;s unlikely, unless there are some simple environmental indicators the caterpillars…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.1717/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
