<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Handheld and low-cost digital holographic microscopy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.0336/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.0336/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Handheld and low-cost digital holographic microscopy — mentioned by frugalfirbolg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4751867</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1211.0336:4751867</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:27:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper on arxiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0336 The reduction in size is possible because they found a way to not use a beam splitter and lenses. Comparing the diagram on Wikipedia makes it easy to see how that could save a lot of space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_holographic_microscopy It would have been nice to see either a model or conventional images of their test targets for qualitative comparison to their resulting holograms. Still cool stuff though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1211.0336/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.optics</category></item></channel></rss>
