HackerPapers

arXiv:1210.0305astro-ph.SR

CFBDSIR2149-0403: a 4-7 Jupiter-mass free-floating planet in the young moving group AB Doradus ?

P. Delorme, J. Gagné, L. Malo, C. Reylé, E. Artigau, L. Albert, T. Forveille, X. Delfosse, F. Allard, D. Homeier

Abstract

Using the CFBDSIR wide field survey for brown dwarfs, we identified CFBDSIRJ214947.2-040308.9, a late T dwarf with atypically red J-Ks colour. We obtained an X-Shooter spectra, with signal detectable from 0.8 to 2.3 micron, which confirmed a T7 spectral type with an enhanced Ks-band flux indicative of a potentially low-gravity, young, object. The comparison of our near infrared spectrum with atmosphere models, for solar metallicity, shows that CFBDSIRJ214947.2-040308.9 is probably a 650-750 K, log g=3.75-4.0 substellar object. Using evolution models, this translates into a planetary mass object, with an age in the 20-200 Myr range. An independent Bayesian analysis from proper motion measurements results in a 87% probability that this free-floating planet is a member of the 50-120 Myr old AB Doradus moving group, which strengthens the spectroscopic youth diagnosis. By combining our atmospheric characterisation with the age and metallicity constraints arising from the probable membership to the AB Doradus moving group, we find that CFBDSIRJ214947.2-040308.9 is probably a 4-7 Jupiter masses free-floating planet with an effective temperature of ~700K and a log g of ~4.0, typical of the late T-type exoplanets that are targeted by direct imaging. We stress that this object could be used as a benchmark for understanding the physics of the similar T-type exoplanets that will be discovered by the upcoming high contrast imagers.

arXiv comments
A&A Accepted
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219984
Subjects
astro-ph.SRSolar and Stellar Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 1 thread, from Nov 2012 to Nov 2012.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Can someone explain to me how this would be termed a planet? Doesn't the very definition of planet imply rotation around a star or other celestial object? The BBC article is a little better: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20309762 And it links to the actual paper…

      ComputerGuruView on HNParent context

    • I think that the news here is that is has been determined that it is not a brown dwarf. See the paper[1] for more details. Though I'm not sure why the distinction between giant planet vs cold tiny star is so important. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0305

      wcoenenView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.