<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.3511/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.3511/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity — mentioned by TameAntelope</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30253065</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1209.3511:30253065</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 23:36:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I said &amp;quot;every&amp;quot; because even some of the best work science has done, General Relativity and the Standard Model, were to my understanding an incompatible set of theories. I did a bit of brief Googling, and it looks like some of that has been resolved and it isn&amp;#x27;t seen as totally incompatible anymore, but even that&amp;#x27;s not locked down as of yet. The Wikipedia page is kind of a mess, but I&amp;#x27;ll link it here for others to save you a few clicks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_beyond_the_Standard_Mo... Of note, it looks like there&amp;#x27;s a debate ongoing even within the citations about…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.3511/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
