<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sagan numbers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.2348/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.2348/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sagan numbers — mentioned by cschmidt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6699115</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1209.2348:6699115</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:59:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That reminds me of the ending of the novel/movie &amp;quot;Contact&amp;quot; by Carl Sagan. When calculating pi in base 11, there was an implausibly long run of 0&amp;#x27;s and 1&amp;#x27;s, which made a pretty picture when you plotted it in two dimensions. So if you entered that picture as your file, the file system would make a major discovery :-). Someone actually wrote a paper on the properties of these numbers: http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2348 This is the second time in a week I&amp;#x27;m mentioning Carl Sagan in a comment. I&amp;#x27;ll stop doing that now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1209.2348/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.HO</category></item></channel></rss>
