<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cofinality spectrum theorems in model theory, set theory and general topology · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5424/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5424/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cofinality spectrum theorems in model theory, set theory and general topology — mentioned by clintonc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15240625</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1208.5424:15240625</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:40:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;p and t are implicitly defined cardinalities (i.e., the smallest cardinalities with given properties). See Definition 1.1 of the source article (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.5424.pdf)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5424/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item><item><title>Cofinality spectrum theorems in model theory, set theory and general topology — mentioned by v64</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15240266</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1208.5424:15240266</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:06:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: I have a math background, but this isn&amp;#x27;t my field. The continuum hypothesis was proved to be independent of ZFC. From glancing at the first few paragraphs of the actual paper [2], it&amp;#x27;s been established for decades that the following inequality holds: aleph_1 &amp;lt;= p &amp;lt;= t, and that aleph_1 = p can be shown to imply aleph_1 = t. Note that the inequalities aren&amp;#x27;t strict inequalities, and this proof is essentially saying that they were equivalent all along. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%E2%80%93Fraenkel_set_t... [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.5424.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5424/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item><item><title>Cofinality spectrum theorems in model theory, set theory and general topology — mentioned by xamuel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15239316</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1208.5424:15239316</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:39:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Actual article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.5424.pdf Great results within a very narrow field, which quantamagazine leverages into a clickbaity title.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5424/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
