<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Twisted equivariant matter · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5055/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5055/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Twisted equivariant matter — mentioned by selimthegrim</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9924285</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1208.5055:9924285</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:54:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some good points, but you refused to address my Bethe Ansatz comment (cf. http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5055, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-theory_(physics)#Reconciling...) and in any case, I recall Schwinger resigning from the APS over cold fusion. Doesn&amp;#x27;t make cold fusion right. Also I didn&amp;#x27;t realize the ground state of the Hubbard model wasn&amp;#x27;t mathematical physics? Spin liquids aren&amp;#x27;t mathematical physics? This is the same old story where people like des Cloizeaux and Pearson discovered bosonization and helped establish the long tradition of condensed matter people studying the Heisenberg…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.5055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
