<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Near-Perfect Sorting of Orbital Angular Momentum and Angular Position States of Light · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.2891/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.2891/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Near-Perfect Sorting of Orbital Angular Momentum and Angular Position States of Light — mentioned by X4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7024773</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1208.2891:7024773</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:10:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I never said that QT is a really available commercial technology. Look I wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; … firstly because &amp;quot;Quantum Teleportation (QT)&amp;quot; is available soon enough for a broader audience than just Physicists … Look up: doi:10.1038/492022a if you don&amp;#x27;t believe in QT. Then I&amp;#x27;m glad to see your arguments on that. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I would like a cite for your bandwidth claim Here you go 10-Gbit/s vs 1-Tbit/s → doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 if you need other details on encodings: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.2891v2.pdf and http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0709.pdf You mention latency, I know about that and I was not sure if I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1208.2891/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
