<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fundamental Issues and Problems in the Realization of Memristors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.7319/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.7319/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fundamental Issues and Problems in the Realization of Memristors — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19650753</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1207.7319:19650753</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 02:35:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s a context that matters. I actually haven&amp;#x27;t compared &amp;quot;a passive circuit element&amp;quot; to an iPhone. I answered to the following (one level above): &amp;quot;I&amp;#x27;ve saved it in my notebook for forward to folks who go on and on about how revolutionary they are.&amp;quot; My claim is that iPhone was &amp;quot;revolutionary&amp;quot; even if &amp;quot;it is not &amp;#x27;fundamental&amp;#x27; in any sense.&amp;quot; Moreover, just &amp;quot;a passive circuit element&amp;quot; that you used is surely way too simple to be used to describe a memristor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memristor Also: https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7319 The way I read it, a resistor is still the only &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; passive…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.7319/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item><item><title>Fundamental Issues and Problems in the Realization of Memristors — mentioned by ngvrnd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4470290</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1207.7319:4470290</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:33:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is worrisome: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7319&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.7319/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
