<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum protocols for the millionaire problem with a third party are trivial · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6739/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6739/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum protocols for the millionaire problem with a third party are trivial — mentioned by scythe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6163564</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1207.6739:6163564</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:26:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Quantum crypto only helps with eavesdropping. To defend against man-in-the-middle attacks you have to use a conventional message authentication code. The system is no stronger than the MAC. False. See e.g. &amp;quot;Quantum protocols for the millionaire problem are trivial&amp;quot;, He 2012 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.6739 &amp;gt; Quantum nondemolition measurements have been used to detect macroscopic objects with a vanishing probability of interaction. There is a good chance the approach can be adapted to detect photons. Interaction-free measurement has certainly been demonstrated, but it doesn&amp;#x27;t do what you think…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6739/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
