<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Large tick assets: implicit spread and optimal tick size · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6325/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6325/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Large tick assets: implicit spread and optimal tick size — mentioned by pierrealexandre</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24359937</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1207.6325:24359937</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 01:09:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is some interesting research regarding the optimal tick size (by instrument), eg https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6325&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.6325/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.TR</category></item></channel></rss>
