<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tensile Strength and the Mining of Black Holes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.3342/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.3342/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tensile Strength and the Mining of Black Holes — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23215100</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1207.3342:23215100</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2020 20:23:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; If the Big Rip were to happen That&amp;#x27;s a really big If. Since we&amp;#x27;re well into the realm of fields-on-General Relativity in this paragraph, you&amp;#x27;d have to add one or more additional fields to provide a &amp;quot;fifth force&amp;quot; (thus, in these sorts of approaches quintessence) to overcome the other known fundamental interactions among the other fields of the Standard Model, of which there are more than three. The fourth, gravitation, is poorly modelled as a force when we are dealing with clearly relativistic gravitation, as is the case with [a] a black hole or [b] the appearance of lots of empty space…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1207.3342/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
