<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1206.6578/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1206.6578/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice — mentioned by jmcmichael</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17768966</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1206.6578:17768966</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:29:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In this instance, the popular understanding corresponds to the latest research better than realist theories like pilot-wave theory. Proponents of realist interpretations of QM have relied for decades on identifying possible classical channels of relativistic communication, or theorizing the existence of hidden variables. The double slit experiment has been used in various forms to, over time, eliminate these channels. I&amp;#x27;m not a physicist, but the language that they are using quite a few papers leads me to believe that these channels have been closed, and the realists are out of remaining…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1206.6578/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
