Solving satisfiability by Bayesian inference · HackerPapers discussions

Solving satisfiability by Bayesian inference — HN submission

Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:33:55 GMT

I've proved that p=np

http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6658 ...and no one wants to/is able refute me.

2 points; 25 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Solving satisfiability by Bayesian inference — mentioned by gizmo686

Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:16:25 GMT

When I opened this page, I was going to be the third comment, then I got caught up trying to explain why their linked paper [1] (proving P=NP) is non-sense. Unfourtuantly, my habit of assuming that my not understanding something just means that I need to re-read it or play with that segment of the proof myself costed me more time than I thought (even after I wrote in my partially completed reply that the introduction alone was sufficient to dismiss the paper as nonsense). Anyway, here is my overkill analysis: I would be highly skeptical of their claim. First of all, if they did prove P=NP…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Solving satisfiability by Bayesian inference — mentioned by bzax

Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:33:12 GMT

You might as well start with his proof of P=NP http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.6658.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.