<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.3365/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.3365/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask) — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18634594</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1205.3365:18634594</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 09:35:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; cosmological constant is derivable from the Standard Model. Well.. not really directly &amp;quot;derivable.&amp;quot; To be more specific, the &amp;quot;problem&amp;quot; is: when using the the &amp;quot;Standard Model of particle physics&amp;quot; (which is confirmed time and again for anything we do with the particles, and which, of course, we anyway know that is still inconsistent with the General Relativity model) to calculate the &amp;quot;renormalized value of the zero-point vacuum energy density&amp;quot; as the contribution to the cosmological constant, the number is calculated that, to our present understanding of the factors involved, can&amp;#x27;t match our…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.3365/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
