<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.0971/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.0971/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions — mentioned by pa7x1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26112137</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1205.0971:26112137</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:17:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: I have no horse in this race, I studied Theoretical Physics but left academia for the industry many years ago. My bills won&amp;#x27;t be paid whatever side of the discussion gets funded. 1. In its canonical formulation we don&amp;#x27;t know if Loop Quantum Gravity produces the right classical limit (i.e. General Relativity). In its spin-foam formulation we can get the right classical limit but we don&amp;#x27;t know if the formulation is mathematically consistent. 2. The semi-classical results that LQG obtains, namely Black Hole entropy, is very suspect. The semi-classical result is pretty much cooked in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1205.0971/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
